Saturday, December 27, 2008

Alternative To Peanut Oil

Anchorage experience - Seventh

Un pezzo di storia importante, quello legato a Martini, non della storia che finisce nei libri e nelle enciclopedie, ma di quella importante per le persone comuni come me e come Martini, appunto. Chi volesse sapere qualcosa in più su Martini e le sue attività può leggere le FAQ di
Allarme Scientology
.

La prima volta che io e Simonetta ci siamo "parlate" è stato via email. Era il 1998 e gestivo, insieme ad Alberto, mio marito, che lo aveva realizzato, il Sito Web del GRIS di Roma. Di tanto in would get requests for information and help through e-mail, then half again little used.

That Harry and Martini (who ran with the Site Alarm Scientology) was an email that I would never forget because it marked the beginning of a collaboration that was interrupted early for Harry, but not for Martini continued, undeterred, the His work of critical information on Scientology to date. The two managers were aware of the alarm site, then that was surely the most current and specialized in the field, saw that have similar objectives and asking us some information before undertaking a series of initiatives on information Web When, some time later, I got to know Simon personally, I realized that we were very different, especially for our beliefs (I am Catholic, you are far). Despite this we share a common desire: to do something to prevent other people end up in the trap of cults and gurus dishonest, something which both, in different ways, we have experienced.

Simon chose to disseminate critical information about Scientology on a personal basis, I decided that in addition to making news, I also tried to render aid and assistance to those who had requested it, because I was part of the association is also involved in this.

I recall with pleasure the first international conference I attended along with Simon: the CESNUR conference in Turin in 1998. She and I went directly home of the "enemy" (as perceived CESNUR in our environment) to discover its weaknesses and, maybe, if possible, give a bit of "discomfort."

experience was really important for both because, beyond the intentions, was the occasion of knowledge and openness to different environments and locations from our own. Not shared, indeed, condemned because it made us think that we would endanger the "cause". However, even that was a way to get to know your enemy, and when the "enemy" look in his eyes, it becomes less enemy and more "human." Then

not including all this was only the first step and it would take several years before being able to look back nin at that 'experience with a closer look would come down in depth.

Simon and I talked a lot in those days told me that although I am Catholic, was able to find points of contact with me on another level, that of values. She said that she seemed to see something called "intellectual honesty", which prevented me from being hypocritical, and this, he said, had never seen before in people who called themselves "Catholic." Usually those who belong to a religion tries to defend and fails to see the "beam" the Gospel in his eye, and can clearly see the speck in that of others.

This was not my case and Simon seemed to appreciate it.

For my part I was struck in her dedication and respect for reason, the "cult" to the reasonableness and freedom of thought, the intolerance for any form of taxation, the desire to learn and broaden their cultural horizons . But all this could not raise the similarities between two people as different as the two of us, if we had not joined another aspect: the tendency to evaluate people not by ideas but by what they are and their actions .

I never even thought to "convert" and she never looked at me with pity or contempt for my faith.

And so we met on the human values \u200b\u200band we estimated that we are not thinking of ourselves change.

I remember when I started to collaborate with CESNUR for the Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy, in 2000, I advised the person who then was President of the GRIS, which I was associated, which encouraged me to participate in the project . When I talked to Simon commented saying it was a good thing that a person of "front" would give an opposite contribution to the first work of its kind in Italy. Following the

always kept informed as the work progressed, the difficulties I met working in a work which by its nature, is not intended to express "value judgments" on the different groups were surveyed. It 'was a very important and Simon is one of the few people with whom I shared uncertainties, doubts, concerns and successes.

Simon was with me not only agree on the first international body to which I participated: one in Turin, but also to another equally significant: the conference at the London School of Economics in 2001 where I celebrated my birthday at the table with the scholars most popular (and very critical with antiseptic) at international level. And even then Martini (in disguise) was there to share with me a special moment. The photo you see in this piece was taken to London, during that conference.

The third great memory is the day we spent together with the late Maurizio Antonello, a special person I met in person with Simon and with whom I maintained a good match for some time. We also exchanged the archive material.

Maurice was a great archivist, as well as being a good professional, so we went to visit him in his library. On that occasion I asked Maurice to help me reconstruct the story of a couple of groups that had drawn up the tab for the Encyclopedia: they were groups that he knew better news to me because he was dating at the beginning of their training. He was happy to cooperate and was also quite proud of the fact that certain documents were not in the library of CESNUR, but only in his.

For my part I learned from Maurizio who had no documents and publications of other groups, however, I had. So, just returned to Rome sent him a package with several books and magazines. He was happy: it was as if he had received a treasure!

But that lasted just one day Maureen told me that the association of which he was part did not like that there were contacts between the two of us: a member of the anti-cult world, of course, was not to write or share documents with people (yours truly ) collaborated with CESNUR (a group of Turin "bad guys" who "uphold the seven")


[About this particular person of ARIS, the Association was also founded in Antonello, clarifies in a comment this piece, there's another version of the denial of Mauritius to continue our collaboration and that this version, which I do not know, may be disclosed only in private].




So our match was suddenly turned off, but I know that Maurice was disappointed because he said it many times in the months that followed, to which her friend telephoned often.

These memories tie to Martini, and much more: to know the people, appreciate what they have good things to say, to experience different fight if necessary, but not to preclude any road and groped always dialogue.
after 10 years from the first virtual contact we both changed, and has been the experience, both positive and negative, to change, illusions and disappointments. In recent years we had heard little, even if none of them had ceased to carry on its promises.

Each time, however, that a situation requires it, that's Martini reappears in its most suitable: a champion of freedom of thought and expression. Not is no accident that the first person who publicly has shown solidarity


when my portal (SRS) has been overshadowed it was her. It was not so much that we felt, but it was as if time had not passed.

2008 was a difficult year for both, but not because of the "seven".

think about it we are united in this: our supposed "enemies" do not really have caused us many problems there are causing our "friends." A fact which is well represented in the famous saying:
from friends look at me from God that I look at my enemies!




So Simon was viciously attacked and maligned (not unlike me) on some forums and newsgroups by people who gravitate to the world of "critical of the seven", that is his world. For these people and organizations, such as ARIS, Simon has become available in several ways, notably as a translator. But what was the grave mistake committed by Martini, mistake that drew on such ferocity?
What have expressed solidarity with the undersigned, after the 'blackout
Portal
SRS, Alarm on Scientology and some newsgroups.
Since then have followed in the months and even today people are in full swing (or a two, maybe three, under multiple nicknames) junk messages posted on some newsgroup that did not lead to any reaction in Martini, now accustomed to this kind of "war", except that at some point real people who qualify with name, representatives and spokespersons of ARIS, we are openly and publicly declared agree with those who trash scattered about Martini, with both hands, on the web.

Faced with such a "daring" Martin has done the right thing.

Anyone interested in knowing what can be learned from his own words, of which I quote only the conclusion because it applies perfectly ignorant of my site which

genesis, today is clear:



is worth noting that this site does not "fall under the blows" of the feared Church of Scientology, which has spared no efforts in this direction, but the blows - and the lack of protection - of the so-called "anti-cult movement" Italian who claims to make information and to protect and assist victims of various sectarian movements.


In conclusion, I would say that, after all, in Italy, "cults" have nothing to fear.
The Italian anti-cult environment tends to eliminate slowly and surely his most able and brilliant leaders, implements legal harassment against its own members, raises internal feuds involving the use of time and money, is delighted to silence the dissent minimum, to oust the "deviant" and defaming the victim of the moment (the series: today for me tomorrow for you).

short, real attitudes of "intolerance" which manifests itself not only destructive to the "enemy" (the seven), but also to his friends, those who are on the same side of the fence.
observing the phenomenon with a bit of detachment (difficult, but you can try) I can not think of dozens of Avandia studies led by sociologists and psychologists who have established beyond possible doubt that the attitude of intolerance is strongly correlated with the 'ignorance or lack of culture.
Moral of the story: being ostracized by these people is beginning to be a sort of "reference", a score more, if there were competitions for titles in this strange world.

Busy in these frantic activity at the Italian anti-cult movement no longer has time and resources to deal with the "seven".

Let's just hope it is not known around: if they know the worst and most enterprising abroad "guru" will move to Italy!

So, I would recommend:






AFTER READING THIS PLUG



Delete them and keeping as much ' ABSOLUTE SECRET!

HAPPY 2009 TO ALL ... ESPECIALLY A MARTINI:))




TRIBUTE TO MARTINI (ERNI)

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Black Dude With A Red Bandana

wedge anchors experience - Sixth Tile


----------------------------------------------- NOTICE

Most of the news reporting I have drawn from the book by Antonella Beccaria "Children of Satan." If there are inaccuracies or errors in the reconstruction of the facts and describes how the role of certain characters of the story I invite you to report it in the comments or by writing to my email (rdm@dimarzio.it).

---------------------------------------------- -

This piece was inspired by a book that was reported a few days ago and have read with great interest even stealing a few hours sleep.
This is the book
Antonella Beccaria entitled "Children of Satan", released in 2006. The book, also published on my
Portal says, about 10 years later, the judicial Marco Dimitri, president of the Children of Satan.

A timely and concise reconstruction of the story is also the thesis of Simone Zanin, published on the website of CESNUR , which carry a


extracted in this blog. A Card on Children of Satan is published on the website CESNUR .

Antonella Beccaria's book reconstructs the story from a well established fact :
the Children of Satan was a case of miscarriage of justice, a legal matter

incredible, built on nothing, which had as its protagonist a Satanist. Reading this book reminded me of stories I have personally experienced

why, in 1996, when the legal problems began to Dimitri and other people close to him, I was associated with the GRIS a couple of years. The association was still called the "Group for Research and Information on the Sects" (today the word "cult" has disappeared and was replaced with the word "socioreligiosa).
I was a novice and I could not even get your bearings in a complicated world and also so full of mystery, pain and evil. It was a world for me still "dark" in all senses. When the case broke Dimitri I considered it, as all who were involved in the GRIS, a wild case of Satanism, one of the few finally come to light where the leader and his followers had been exposed due to the courageous testimony of regretted the leakage and also the commitment of members of the board of which I was part of the association.

was right and proper that the police and the judiciary did clarify the facts and punish criminals properly Satanists.
In association rumors that people engaged in the Bologna Center, together with other priests and exorcists of the place, had collaborated in the unmasking of the satanic cult, but there was no official statements.



At least I did not know anything more.

Personally, I interpreted the silence and the reluctance of people in the GRIS, which from time to time I turn to for information, as a sign of the importance of maintaining the confidentiality of information during the investigation. What I did not understand was, however, the huge mass of news that were published in the newspapers about the allegations and evidence of supertestimone, the interviews by members of the Bologna GRIS and exorcists known as Father Amorth.

short, it seemed that everyone knew all the newspapers were on superinformati Dimitri and his "ritual murder", the expert interviews were the order of the day, everyone was talking about, testified as published.

My questions, however, seemed of place and did not get answered. I was a newbie: ask for explanations to learn and understand, to understand what was happening and what was the role of the association of which I was part in the affair. The very simple question that I addressed more than once to experts that plays a direct role in the GRIS was this: "Really, Dimitri has done what it says in the papers? you really know the witness as the newspapers say and little Frederick, who was put in the coffin with the corpse of Margaret? "



The answer was evanescent: "We know, we know there are witnesses. Dimitri? It 's a Satanist: Something must have made ... not for us to say whether he is guilty. We think justice" .

Despite the evasive answers and left half of the sentences in the meantime Maria Radio broadcast a program conducted by the section on Satanism and Giuseppe Ferrari PM Lucia Musti was interviewed during the program, the Osservatore Romano is directly involved publishing some articles on the topic, including one signed by the PM himself, just as the trial began Dimitri. short, he could not speak, but everyone talks about. In

GRIS there was a climate of satisfaction with what was happening. Finally, a Satanist was being sentenced for the terrible crimes of which he had spotted.


I remember in particular one night when I was quite impressed by the image of Dimitri that stood on a giant screen as he was being interviewed at a known transmission Television, in conjunction with Bologna. It seemed a really strange person, a disreputable individual (as those are my standards of "person recommended). Dimitri, visibly "furious" and unable to control his mood, accused in a note directed anthropologist, well known in Italy, who was in the studio: he says the anthropologist had said (or written) a lie: that the walls of his apartment were covered with dung. The response to this accusation by the anthropologist was that the news had been "passed" by a third person.

Certainly the themes of "debate" diquella transmission were also others, but this example says long on the reliability of certain sources "anti-Satanism" or better, then, "antidimitri.

fact is that a newbie like me that transmission did not provide any clarification on the matter: to contribute, however, be reinforced the negative image that I already had Marco Dimitri and his sect.

use the word "image" because that's what was going on everything is based on an image,

ie, an "impression, idea that a character gives himself to the public based on the way or the way in which it occurs. "

was only one image, that of Dimitri, and I thought it was reality.
Satanism is something personally repugnant to me, no sympathy Dimitri does not inspire me even today, but what has happened in my opinion is still very serious.

Today I realize that to believe the truth of that "image" I was not alone and were not the only ones to share GRIS but millions of people: all those who read newspapers, listen to the radio and watched television.



Antonella Beccaria reading the book, which I will quote some parts between brackets and in different colors, today I was able to reflect on those years and I've also included a lot of More on what happened then and the role of GRIS in the case.



Antonella Beccaria reports that the first contact between the GRIS and the protagonists of this story " dates back to August 1995, when the father of Elizabeth Dozza (ed. the supertestimone), which would be made to attend Satanists asked the association to its Via del Monte (editor's note the Bologna Center of the GRIS is in Via del Monte) information about Marco Dimitri and his group. In October, then when you start to assume that Federico (ed child three years who was raped by Dimitri and cronies and then placed in the coffin with the corpse of Margaret) was a victim of satanic ritual abuse, the child's mother turns to Father Dermine. At the same time also the mother of Elizabeth returns to ask for support for her daughter. The psychologists recommended for families are indicated by the study group " .

From the reconstruction of the author it seems that everything would begin with the reporting of family members who had problems with their children (Elizabeth and Frederick), give them Dimitri and his sect and are aimed at a local counseling centers for help: requests for help like many others who come to counseling centers. The family, in this case, were concerned about their children alleged "victims "a satanic cult. The story begins, So how many more the like of which I spoke in the first step . In his reconstruction

Antonella Beccaria continues: ".
.. when you made the first elements of an offense, the seat of Gris became an obligatory stop for the police, as confirmed by depositions of Marshal Cabras dated February 1996, which will make use of experts who are here to make their own advisors. In addition, the Gris already knew the Children of Satan, having been the subject of some jokes by telephone Dimitri, but - more important - getting the fanzines that Satanists cared about preaching. Following contacts with the police were often characterized by requests for information and literature on the subject about the relationship that existed between the satanic cults operating in Italy
.
This is also a script that is repeated continuously when you assume offenses occurred within religious groups and para. The information comes mostly from groups of victims: the use made of it depends very much by the court and the investigating prosecutor. As I clarified in the Fourth Tile the problem of the reliability of the information and the use they make of the judges and law enforcement is a very serious problem. Dimitri's case it is a prime example.

Dimitri ends up in jail at the end of January 1996 and then again for 400 days in June of that year. His lawyers will not have much difficulty in "
demonstrate that the dates of the alleged violence (ed rape of Elizabeth) are unlikely, you can not pack a mo 'candy under a curse almost as big as a wall to take it in around a view of yet another black mass. Or that the bodies of victims of a ritual sacrifice could not get into a camp stove used, according to the prosecution's story, as a makeshift crematorium because its size was not sufficient even to bake a wedding cake. "" There is no trace even of the report drawn up by the emergency room doctor who had visited Elizabeth Dozza night of violence, which had used the real name or
false ".



Every detail revealed by the girl turns out to be baseless. For example, the" Master ": the rape of Elizabeth also participated in a mysterious character named" Maestro. "You will understand after the elusive Master Damian Berto is a slightly sui generis " to round, gives private tuition to students blockheads. With these Words explains the origin of the nickname, the "Master . However, the day of the alleged rape Berto was not even in Italy, but in Thailand.


Date rape is shifted by one week but this time things go wrong: In the night of the alleged rape Elizabeth did not suffer any violence but is out with her boyfriend. The test is that it takes a fine, while in the car with her, to be passed with the red light.


Soon comes the second accusation: Dimitri has a child of three years, Fred, was in a coffin where the body of a woman, Margaret, after raped him with others.

Who is Fred? Frederick is a child who began to show strange behavior: he wants only milk, not solid food, do not want the diaper to be changed, if it irritates to accurdirlo is the father, wakes up scared in the night, denotes anxiety and becomes uncontrollable when mother, a psychologist, goes off to work.

Federico initiating therapy and at home with him at that time, there is still the baby sitter, a lively fourteen-year-cousin of Frederick. This , which has since established a sister,

improves. The baby sitter is sent away and later be accused of bringing the child (Dimitri's prey) in sect.
As Fred's family is convinced that the child is affected or possessed by the devil, it relies on a local exorcist. Federico is exorcised and, subsequently, he will also deal with another cleric who already is dealing with the recovery of Elizabeth.

Meanwhile, the number of suspects arrive at nine, among them also Efrem Del Gatto (Satanist Roman), the Marquis Bevilacqa and baby sitter of Frederick, who will then be regarded as completely unrelated to the facts. The "poor" Efrem Del Gatto will be pulled back into play even after the acquittal of Dimitri and the other, in a subsequent investigation in 1999, when he was already dead from a heart attack three years.

But back to the investigation. Antonella Beccaria, in his book continues: " Then, pulling the strings, Federico has strange behavior and this follows from the violence, Elizabeth confirmed the saying that it had participated personally in the rites and to enhance the words of the girl comes in. the exorcist, Father Clement Leonardi. The evidence, beyond the words of witnesses, not even the shadow .

The press, however, proceeds in the amplification of panic and raises the bar: With Resto del Carlino comes the "Children of Satan Corporation: news rituals and satanic groups working under the auspices of Dimitri coming in from all over Italy: Pompeii , La Spezia, Rome, etc. Sondrio. "I


Children of Satan will be held responsible for ritual sacrifices, brutal murders consumed with unexpected characters in their palatial homes. The victims were an immigrant, Roma children and perhaps even without a fixed home. Too bad that you can not find even a shred of the corpse in order to substantiate these stories
.
But it's easy to find an explanation for the lack of corpses were burned
and, to substantiate this thesis, we assume that both used the "infamous" stove of the house of Dimitri. The last step in the argument of megacomplotto is made: there is a "third level". Within satanic, in fact, have involved high officials and dignitaries. A prime example of these alleged people untouchable and powerful is the unfortunate Ariosti Ippolito Bevilacqua, a marquis of Bologna, which "learns in November 1996 of its involvement in a the Children of Satan" from the rest of the Carlino . Turns out to be investigated for murder and his house was searched. It is located only a black cloth that could be evidence of Satanism. In reality it was a cloth used to cover the piano and that was only used by the servant. will always be the same newspaper that the Marquis will know, in August 1998, Archive of the branch of investigation which he is called into question. "Really the proceedings as I'm concerned has been filed? It gives me a good news, I did not know yet. Even if I suspected, given the outcome of the first comment on the process itself Marquis."



Returning the "third level". I well remember that in those years was often speak of the existence of a "third level" in anti-cult circles and within groups to assist victims. They told me that it was unexpected and powerful people who were leading the ranks of Satanism in Italy and around the world, all linked together and powerful. How says Antonella Beccaria: "
In other words, Dimitri and his associates would be too scalzacani to be more than mere mercenaries of the occult that, ultimately, would act with the sole purpose of selling human flesh, preferably children . At this point, the fear is palpable ...
a pedophile. "



I I was terrified that there was a third level of importance than Dimitri and his group if they were criminals so they could do what those who were at the top of the pyramid?
What no one could explain



because it was passed from the first level (that of Dimitri and cronies) on the third level by omitting the second (who was on the second floor / level?). I never knew until I discovered that it had never existed any level.
This and more I discovered some time later, when I began to study and not reliable "in toto" to second-hand information. Dimitri The conclusion of the story is an example: returns a bit of confidence in justice. He was acquitted the first time

June 20, 1997.

The Board law judges who sentenced his acquittal verdict for the defendants "because the crime does not exist" for all the accusations as "satanic."
" 2000 is the year of absolution in the second degree for Marco Dimitri: January 25, in fact, the Court of Appeal upheld the first instance of two and a half before finally closing the legal chapter of the Children Satan come even without the Supreme . In the new ruling, similar to that issued by Judge Sergio Cornia, affirming the innocence of Dimitri, Bonora, Luongo and the other defendants. It also confirmed the unreliability of supertestimone while Elizabeth Dozza , regarding the little Federico, back to say that perhaps the baby suffered some form of violence, but more likely he was given notice the silence after seeing her cousin baby sitter to have sex with her boyfriend at the time.

The president of the Children of Satan have been one hundred thousand euro in cash as compensation for wrongful imprisonment, money that is came from state coffers, that is out of our pockets.
After more than ten years what happened to the Children of Satan? According to Antonella Beccaria "Children of Satan
currently include more or less than 1200 members. But the activists do not go beyond twenty. Most of those who are affiliated to the online and


not pay even the membership fee, fifty euro per year. Meanwhile, the site has grown to collect documentation on Satanism and pagan esoteric culture. "
So, the story has caused much suffering, marked the lives of innocent people on both sides but did not eliminate Dimitri and the Children of Satan from the face of the earth, as some would have liked. contrary: it has given them more visibility. not even need to prevent other crimes in other satanic groups other thickness criminal fine as that of the Beasts of Satan, where the police intervened when the victims were already unfortunately.



I do not know what was the fate of supertestimone and his family nor that of Frederick and his family hope that their problems will be solved, but if it was it was certainly not for the scandal and the witch-hunt caused by people who (I persist in thinking) were in good faith and did only what they thought was their duty.

would be nice, however, that the story Dimitri had taught us something, especially to us that we are committed to giving help, advice and reliable information for families concerned about their relatives affiliated with any religious group "weird."

In his thesis Simone Zanin cites Jenkins (1992), which "at the end of his study of moral panics in England in the late '80s and early '90s, he thinks that the alarms Social concerning "women" and "children" will continue to spread, mainly because of the irreversible path of family change in its traditional sense and the sense of discomfort associated with this process social
"and another scholar,
Stanley Cohen (1980), the which "calls upon the

f ine a famous book:
who is next? " . I or transform its application to the plural: Who will be the next? Dimitri After we had other" demons "and" witches "put on trial and there

still others, today, put on the gallows media. We can not delude ourselves: there will always be because, as Lucas says in the preface Antonella Beccaria's book:

"

is also on this morbid fascination of evil and deviant that
book is sobering. On that anxiety excitement that makes us run for newspapers every time we read the word, satanic, almost absurdly we wish to see come true our worst fears, instead of asking what exactly that word, based on what actually the right to evoke, and fairness and professionalism expected by the user. And then, perhaps, extend this caution to many other words also abused by the news and our imagination. "

Kates Playground Washin Machine

The story judicial Children of Satan


REPRESENTATION AND AMPLIFICATION OF DEVIANCE
IN THE CASE OF CHILDREN OF SATAN

Simone Zanini


Thesis in Sociology of Deviance
presented and discussed at the Faculty of Law University of Bologna (advisor Prof. Dario Melossi)



Published on the Web site of CESNUR



------------- -------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
reconstruction historical records of events is from Chapter 3:



THE CASE OF ITALIAN CHILDREN OF SATAN


24/1/1996



is given news of the (subsequent to the issuance of orders of custody) by Marco Dimitri, Bonora and Pier Giorgio Gennaro Luongo (respectively president, vice president and "follower", but many will be disputes about the degree of affiliation Luongo in BdS) with allegations of rape at the end of lust and sexual assault against Elizabeth Dozza, former girlfriend of Luongo and entered the "cult". The rape took place during the celebration of a black mass and the girl was allegedly given a cup of coffee containing chloroform.

1/2/1996

some floppy disks seized from the apartment of Dimitri check a long list of members of the sect. The alarm is raised from the inclusion of children of the medium, even twelve years old, and their possible implications in the rites of a sexual nature.

13/2/1996

a result of the application filed at the Court of Review by the defenders of the accused, Dimitri, Bonora are released, while Luongo (also accused of a second violence bodily harm to the girl) are given house arrest for a month.

15/2/1996

News of the alleged (that will be revealed only after ...) Dozza of suicide attempt, saved off limits by a Romanian truck driver. Elizabeth, accuses the judiciary of being left alone at the mercy of vindictive retaliation of the members of the sect

01/22/1996 - 08/06/1996

parents a small child of three years, protected by the press under the pseudonym of Frederick, complain to the police a alleged case of SRA against their minor during a black mass. Initially, according to press reports, the story concerning the infant is not connected to the case of BDS. Over the months, psychiatrists and psychologists to examine the baby try to understand the extent to which his stories are credible or not.

9/6/1996

New arrest warrants for the three "Satanists" kidnapping and sexual abuse of a minor and vilification of the corpse. The line of investigation, which was deemed unrelated but parallel to that of BDS, shines a spotlight on the positive acknowledgment, by psychologists and psychiatrists, the truth of the sensational revelations of the three year old child, who would report to satanic rituals which would be submitted in August last year. The trait d'union between the Satanists of the BDS is the small would have been his cousin, Linda chervil, was responsible for him as a baby sitter during the period.

17/6/1996

The accusation against Dimitri, the mother of a mentally unstable boy of Pompeii and traces of black masses in the Naples area, leading the investigators and the media to assume a 'disturbing ramifications of satanic sects throughout the Italian peninsula.

1/8/1996

enters David Zanotti, affiliated with BdS resident in La Spezia. La Spezia Digos-confession during an interrogation ensure the presence of a Satanist group acting in the area. Immediately suggests a link with Bologna (and this will lead to several investigations in various branched prosecution of Italy, "the outlaws seem esoteric branches of the movement extended to at least 35 cities," so ... "Il Resto del Carlino" of 5 / 9) and with Dimitri.

5/9/1996

is also involved in investigating the Brotherhood of Ephrem's Roman Cat (another member of the Italian sectarianism visible and public

).

10/10/1996

Asked to trial for seven by the prosecutor of Bologna for both charges.

15/10/1996

released Gennaro Luongo for running of time (from the magistrate accepted the argument of the offense continued between the two alleged rapes).

26/10/1996

granted the request for immediate rite ( thus bypassing the preliminary hearing) to Dimitri, Bonora and Luongo Ferrari.

29/10/1996

on remand, following the preliminary hearing, two other people (Berto and Bagnolini). Acquitted "because the offense is not" instead of the aunt of the little "abused", mother of Linda.

8/11/1996

Registered under investigation again, Dimitri, Bonora and Luongo. This time for alleged human sacrifice.

13/2/1997

opening of the investigation hearing, which shall set down a thirty hearings.

1/3/1997

The supertestimone throws in the towel because of an illness and shirks-examination.

20/6/1997

The Board judges who sentenced reads its verdict to the acquittal of the defendants "because the crime does not exist" for all the accusations as "satanic."

Friday, September 19, 2008

Best Magic The Gathering Trample Cards

Anchorage experience - Fifth Anchor ABC


For those who read this blog for the first time I say that these "
anchors" are scattered notes and ideas developed over time based on personal experience. Nothing more than that.

In these pieces speak of a phenomenon of which are witnessed several times in recent years and has given me many questions and thoughts. These questions and would now like to share these thoughts with anyone interested.


I refer to the phenomenon that always occurs in the history of a religious group of any kind is: that crisis and the subsequent abandonment of a number of members. Which ever way you experience it is a very difficult time for the group because it is his own survival. Suffering from this situation is not only the exiles, but also those who remain in the group, though for entirely different reasons.


It is not the subject of my reflection a specific case nor intend to make judgments of some kind: My general thought is the phenomenon that interests me in this context is the only way in which members and former members behave in the face of crisis.

If the members who leave the group are limited in number, the crisis usually falls in a short time and also becomes an opportunity for verification and correction of defects and dynamic counter-productive. This happens fairly open groups where the leadership is exercised in a balanced manner and actions of leaders are designed to get the best for the group and individual. In these cases the criticisms are addressed within of the group and attempt to reach a compromise that preserves at least in part the different positions.

Unfortunately, in most cases the phenomenon does not occur in this way and not have these outcomes. I was able to personally observe the temporal evolution or involution of some religious groups and I think I can show (as usual risk of oversimplifying) that I think two factors are decisive on the type of crisis and its outcome:


1) personality characteristics and motivations of the members (both critics and satisfied)

2) the role of the social system in which the group operates in crisis


---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------


1) The personality characteristics and motivations of members critical


First case: When members critical individuals are essentially made with affective-emotional situations and their peaceful existence is not lived according to the group in which they invest all their psychological resources, their criticism is aimed at the good of the group and, when they realize that the purpose the latter no longer correspond to their expectations, I give up. A self-abandonment which leads certainly suffering, disappointment and so on., But these feelings are experienced with balance and, over time, dissolve into new experiences and new ways of aggregation.

Second case: When members critics are people for whom the group is of such importance that act as "support" in the absence of other groups or contact persons, then the emotional charge linked to membership means that the individual in the group are only the satisfaction of his emotional needs and emotional. In this case, when in which the group no longer performs this function is not acting as a support and the leader is no longer responding to expectations, the criticality is characterized by destructive aspects that may occur in several ways. ------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------- ---------------------

2) The role of the social system in which the group operates in crisis



The role of the social system in which the group acts is of great importance. In the case of the "seven", for example, it is perceived by minority groups outside the social system as "different" and "dangerous" and therefore tend to provoke from those who fear foreign and / or aversion. Who gives a group called the "cult" knows that there is more effective than this to raise the alarm and warn those involved in security, welfare and protect the weak.
The phenomenon is complementary to

demonization of the group is always that of '
elevation of those who are credited with having discovered the sect and warned of the danger. While the group plunges into the ocean of his wickedness, who has exposed is raised to the highest peaks of morality, self-sacrifice, courage and so on.

This effect is strengthened by the amplification of the phenomenon brought about by the press whose role is simply to "hype" and "eco" that expands in all directions until you reach the largest possible number of people. Once the sect ferried through the 'media Acheron the aim has been achieved, and the hell is enriched by stories desperate souls (let hope you ch' revenue ). I witnessed this phenomenon several times, however, shows a constant: the more it is amplified in the growing phase much more suddenly and silently disappears when the "case" becomes "old" and cease to arouse interest (Audience).

Over time (sometimes months, sometimes years) the dichotomy between "bad" and "good" dissolves slowly and tends to zero in parallel with the disappearance of the news from the headlines of newspapers.

The role of the social system in which the group acts is important because it may affect the way the exiles live their abandonment of the group. This happens when the exiles are addressed to individuals and groups who offer their help. The way that lends aid is very important because the person out of a group is certainly ailing and disoriented. It is in a time of great uncertainty as it has lost a reference affective rely on. Its main motivation is to be understood, supported and guided, to be recommended to overcome his personal crisis.


The people in this situation you confide very easily with those who present themselves as an effective support and rely completely as one who is drowning and grabs the first floating object that passes nearby.
That object could be a tree trunk or a snake, but when there is a risk of drowning, there is neither time nor a way to make sure. As it seems the person clings to a tree trunk.

There are several witnesses of people and getting out of a sect, have turned to for help and support groups. Their stories are of course very different from each other.
In many cases, people who lend themselves to give aid to the group are well-intentioned aid plays a positive role of emotional reassurance, allows the individual to relive, recount and calmly reflect on what happened. Contact with these people (who often have had a similar experience) proves fruitful and accompanies the person to gradually emerge from its state of confusion and suffering, recovering other relationships and other opportunities for achievement. These people over time that can discriminate good that they have received from the group and what we reject, and that in this recall as "abuse" conditioning "and so on. Often also undertake to notify their former friends and trying to communicate (where possible) their concerns, the their crisis, to ensure that they can be aware of what they have understood. This action can sometimes result in the defection of other members, but not always.

In other cases, people are aid organizations in which the emphasis is placed on the importance of take action to limit or eliminate the hazard the group to which people are in difficulty outputs. If, for example, relatives of people affiliated to an organization asking for help because they believe that their loved one has fallen into the trap of a dangerous cult, they understand the goal is to obtain the release of the person from the group and the recovery of the bonds family. The difficulty of achieving this may push those who place themselves as support group to proceed in other ways. If people "brainwashed" do not leave the sect, despite several attempts at persuasion, you can get the result in a seemingly more effective trying to hit and destroy the sect through an action that starts from the outside and try to solve the problem at its root. If the sect is wiped out, the problem is resolved.

In these cases, the escapees are comforted and re-socialization so that you finally convinced that they have been brainwashed and engage in an action considered as noble because they aimed to destroy a "cancer" affecting society and not only the individual and his family.

From what I could observe, at this point, there are two possible outcomes:


First results: the drama is and remains personal. The person denies the important choices made in the group reflecting their directives-life philosophy-values \u200b\u200b- teaching (with the resulting transformation relations between spouses, return to conditions prior to entry into the group, etc.).. The tragedy is personal and the effects occurring in the most personal and intimate relationship.


According outcome: the person you turn to fight the sect. In this case goes beyond the rejection of what was experienced in the group and its previous choices and choose to actively engage in individual or group to combat a phenomenon that is considered dangerous for the individual and society.

Once the group is in charge of the sect openly fight in a short time it has been enhanced with new characters alongside the first leaked that report abuse of various kinds, when the scandal broke, other former members enter the scene initially remained silent. They add flavors of other abuses to which they have witnessed when they were in the group and they do not have personal experience but they were spectators. Do not report such abuse, but they join to others because motivated by a dissatisfaction and concerns that were present for some time, and, in time of crisis, can be voiced with greater force and, providentially for them, great media coverage.


And now let us ask what happens in the cult and what is the success that the actions of former members and critics organizations' support and help "get in an attempt to break up the group and cause the greatest possible number of defections.


Again, the modes are very different and you can not describe all the nuances of behavior. So I try once again to distinguish two major trends that I think are representative of the complexity of the phenomenon:


1) Reaction of satisfied members that remain such. These are the members of the accused that, despite the negative testimony of former members of harsh, do not deny anything about the previous experience that continue to share values, meaning and / or doctrine. In these cases the decisions of life carried out in the group are consolidated and enhanced because the external action is perceived (rightly or wrongly) as persecution that

confirms the goodness of the experience. In these subjects the various ways in which the persecution of former friends manifests are reinterpreted in light of the teaching-philosophy-group values \u200b\u200bthat are further recognized as valid and corresponds to the truth. The active action against the sect in these cases will get exactly the opposite effect to that desired. It would be interesting to examine the personality characteristics and personal history of these members who remain, despite everything, "loyal" to their group and how they they reinterpreted and resist the unpleasant feeling of being branded as "brainwashed and sectarian."
2) reactions of the members outside the "war" being . It is configured through feelings of loss and uncertainty. It occurs in rethinking what was experienced in the group by comparing the allegations and noting that the actual critical elements, although there are, however, does not affect the essential goodness of the experience. These people (the majority) remain outside of any debate or confrontation, and they tend to literally "disappear" to avoid being dragged into a conflict between opposing parties too painful for them because the actors of the conflict are often people known and well esteemed and loved.

------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
Let us ask: what happens to
group leaders accused ?


The reaction of the charismatic leader may be very different and depends on many factors.
When it comes to a bad faith individual who intentionally harms his victims in order to exercise power over them and also get economic benefits of the reaction may be to escape as happened in a case in point here in Italy. The thing that could raise some concern is that, faced with such a blatant show of bad faith, the followers of these people continue to defend and to attribute supernatural powers. In this case the charges, trial, sentencing were not enough to destroy the faith of his loyalists.



When a leader is personally convinced of its powers and the highest goal of the group he founded it follows all the ups and downs and do everything possible because the group will survive even in the face of more intense action outside world. In extreme cases, when the leader is highly disturbed and mentally unbalanced, may, as a last act of authority, to decide on self-destruction and his loyal followers ready to obey to the end. Cases of murder
collective suicide are well known and several times I wrote it myself.

When the leader is considered innocent in the face of accusations tries to defend himself with the tools that supply it with justice and this is always supported by the part of followers who remained faithful .
In Italy there is a case in which the leader has been tried and found guilty. It 'been in prison and had to compensate a lot of money to people who accused him. Despite this, both he and his followers (who helped raise the necessary amount) have always been confident of his innocence and they attributed the outcome of the trial of false testimony and subsequent miscarriage of justice. The negative outcome of the process was interpreted as "an injustice allowed by the Lord as a proof of faith." Years later, the group founded by this person grows and spreads in different countries around the world. The prestige of the leader and his followers' trust in him is not in the least cracked.
Similar cases have occurred in the internationally known religious movements whose leaders came under process as Ikeda (Soka Gakkai), Moon (Unification Church) and so on. The movements led by such people still exist and, after the inevitable changes, always enjoy "good health".



How to explain this phenomenon? Why

action to destroy a leader and his group do not always get results?
Me I am often asked, and I can not say that they have resolved a question so difficult. However I would try to think a moment about what makes a person "charismatic"

.


I think the answer to two questions I made both in the characteristics of
charisma. For charisma in this context mean that set of characteristics inherent in a person who makes very lovable, worthy of consideration, respect and even reverence by those who share its values, philosophy or doctrine. I believe that the "charisma" of a person, as you do all you can not undo or destroy. What you can do is hit hard to discourage and weaken, undermine the positive image in all ways.

None, however, as we have seen, can be assured that this action will produce the desired effect. I have observed that certain leaders Charismatics in the attack of the outside world begin to experience the transforming role: no longer feel the leaders, but victims. They do not pretend: they feel truly victims in this way and are perceived by their followers remained faithful. Sometimes there is an inner process of self-criticism that brings the leader to take on imaginary crimes and real crimes, in an attempt to atone for "the sins of everyone, even those were not his.

Oppressed from the aggressive from the outside and suffering caused to many members involved in the "war" tend to take on full responsibility and see the humiliation to which they are subjected as a means of redemption.
When this happens, except for the few who attack them and accuse them, the authority and the authority of these leaders is not tarnished in any way. If it were possible, even if only for a short time, re-group, this authority, which derives from charisma, is reflected as before the crisis and perhaps more than before.





I think I can say that

the charismatic leader acts as a catalyst
powerful emotions, deep feelings and experiences that seem to always accessible and available to re-create the cohesion of the group while it is (physically) dispersed. The experiences shared in the experiential group as they are still internalized at deep levels.

The power of the charism is expressed at its maximum when the leader dies because he continues to live for his followers in his words, his gestures and his teachings. This explains the survival of groups for decades, even after the demise (temporary or definitive) of the leader. Over time, the group undergoes changes which are inevitable because it imposes the death of the leader, but the "spirit" remains and the charisma continues to act even if "transformed."

The reappearance of the leader (or a replacement for his influential) is sufficient to restore the system that comes together like a puzzle whose pieces each to regulate themselves in order to recover place.

These observations refer to different cases: when the leader was jailed after being found guilty when he was accused and later acquitted of the worst crimes, when his image was damaged by the 'help of the media and even when he died. The charisma continues to live after him, internalized, revived and reinterpreted by those who follow the steps.

I would not conclude this plug, with a note of pessimism, but with a word of healthy realism. I that would be appropriate to address the problems with the humility of those who can recognize the complexity and seeks to prevent its occurrence, the only "weapon" very effective and especially those with no contraindications to any medications "aggressive" are: to kill a virus wipes out the entire immune system of an individual.




E 'wise? But most of all: it is useful to achieve the aim, that is healing?
I leave it to anyone looking for the answer. I think I've found.

Sunday, September 14, 2008

Free Zoophilia Bestiality Blog

of new religious movements experience


of new religious movements,
Raffaella Di Marzio and Introvigne




Data Bibliographic
Copertina del titolo 'ABC dei nuovi movimenti religiosi'
Publication date - September 2008
Edizioni San Paolo Cinisello Balsamo (MI) 2008, first ed.
64 pages - format 15x21


ISBN 9788821563171






Description

A new volume in the ABC series that provide a first approach based on various topics often hard to bear for their natural complexity. The ABC offers a comprehensive picture directing the reader to understand the dimensions of the topic, sources, open debate Catholic teaching on the subject.

Two leading experts as Introvigne and Di Marzio in this book help the reader to know the size and characteristics of the phenomenon of new religious movements (NRM): how to distinguish them from the seven, the issue of brainwashing, the types, the most famous, by Jehovah's Witnesses to Mormons, Children of God by Sai Baba, Dianetics, Scientology, to the Beasts of Satan. The book, which collects the formula contained in the alphabetical order, it also offers the fixed points for the interpretation and pastoral in front of this contemporary phenomenon, as well as a guide for possible investigation.


From:


http://www.paolinitalia.it/libri/catalogo.asp?p=9&isbn=9788821563171


Thursday, May 29, 2008

Womens Replacement Heels

Anchorage - Anchorage Fourth Tile


The fourth piece is a attempt to answer the question I asked at the end of the first piece
underlined in blue in so far as to ask the question:


[...] I remember that I spent hours on the phone trying to reassure and give hope to people who believe they lost to Always loved one in a cult. Those talks, often very harrowing, reinforced in me an aversion to all these groups and their leaders who did so much harm to vulnerable people.


After a "placement" of a couple of years and dozens of phone calls ended in this way, I began seriously to think that the only solution, in front of so many cases of psychological abuse perpetrated within sectarian groups, were to reintroduce the crime of plagiarism abolished by the Constitutional Court in 1981.

This belief was based on the following axioms:

a) the information provided by the person who asks for help, and certainly are more reliable

b) the joint stumbled into the cult has changed and rejects his family and his old friends because of the sect that controls its behavior, emotions, the information it receives and also his way of thinking (my masters "were Steve Hassan and Margaret Singer)

c) the seven religious groups are (or are presented as such) that aim to seduce the innocent and unsuspecting people

d) a Once the person has been primed with the ruse is slowly mentally conditioned by the leader and the group to leave its target group and make his new family sect

s) in the sect, the person loses his freedom of choice and its willingness to act reasonably

f) because there is no abuse bigger than the other to remove the freedom and rationality, the solution lies in punishing these actions vigorously through the establishment of an ad hoc crime.

What was wrong with this "theorem"? [...]


Today I will try to answer this question, although it is not easy to do in a few lines. I apologize since now if I'll have to make some simplifying too much.


the certainty of those seeking help is a key element that guides all actions of counsel in a particular direction. As for me I never thought to question the assertions made in the Tears of a mother or a father, a husband or a wife. Those people needed help and assistance and the cult that caused them those suffering could only be such (ie a criminal group of its members who abuse defenseless), or the tears and the pain would never have existed.
The condition of "victims" made those people infallible their undeniable experience, their point of view the only possible. Even today I am convinced that their experience was authentic and, with it, even if their request for help, as it was my sincere desire to provide them the help that I was required.

Going back in time and poking in the memory, I remember that some families came to me already clear about the fact that their relative was over in a cult. Those families had already read "Mentally Liberi" Hassan (a text whose translation I have personally contributed as a consultant) or chapters of books were found by Margaret Singer in the network.

Other times, people describing the problems that their jointly created in the family and gave only some vague indication of what could be the cause. It was at that point that it became automatic for me to explain the strange behavior and the changes occurring attributing nefarious influence of the group.

If the changes in habits and attitudes were incomprehensible to the person's family (which, of course, we do not share) it was necessary that the "brainwashed" would be helped to return as it was before. The changes were always interpreted as the result of mental manipulation, were not the result of free choice and therefore, for the sake of the victim, had to be "correct."

Everything was already prepared and placed inside a frame of reference the same for everyone:

the symptom change of ideas, feelings, habits, friendships and so on.


the cause: the cult
  • care: the person decondition
  • The third point was critical because it requires a goal, the only one that mattered to families. The failures in the "care" and had many successes were limited in some cases taken at the beginning of the "disease" when the symptoms had just occurred and the adept, immediately discouraged and scared, and left the group before that the work of proselytism did really taken.
  • The disappointment I felt when all efforts proved futile and the poor adept get caught in the web in which he had fallen was really hot, but now I wonder: perhaps there was a little disappointed in myself for not being IO "successful" in my task? Maybe yes, deep down we are all human beings.
completely immersed in the environment of assistance and aid groups could not see things from another perspective, who looks like an immense landscape, turning the head only ever on the same side. I could not see the case in front of me as one of many cases of conflicts that occur within the families and that the sect could be just the trigger of a process that had begun some time or who were already in place.

dell'allontameneto attribute all the responsibility of the child to a foreign agent could be, for the family, comforting and useful for downloading their responsibilities, to me it could be a way to simplify the solution of a very complex problem .

If I had more experience and flexibility I might suggest the need to examine calmly
ALL components of the conflict, even those that were already present
FIRST affiliation. Even If during the talks showed sometimes present problems in the family even before affiliation, do not ever put in the right light, I believed, however, an item of minor importance compared to the influence of the sect who always considered crucial.

If I did I would have noticed (and this only after I understood it) that, in most cases, the cause of conflicts and that the sect was not only in a limited number of families existing problems could attributable ONLY membership of their relative.
These were REAL
cases of abuse and circumvention, due to the action of unscrupulous charismatic leaders worried only their own benefit and the exercise of power over vulnerable people.
Although, as I mentioned above, the main objective (the estrangement from the sect of the joint) is not hardly ever reached, now I realize how important it was of great comfort to the families to speak of their suffering with someone who does not summarily dismiss them but trying to understand their plight.
Many people have thanked me and still continue to do so, years later, the mere fact of having been heard when no one else had shown himself willing to do so.

The testimony of those families who continue to remain in touch with me after many years is invaluable. Thanks to them, in fact, I realized that the influence of time and changes that occur in individuals and social systems is crucial and often overlooked.

Who provides assistance does so in a given time. Once past the emergency contact is lost with people.

E 'instead very important to check
distance of time the effects that the action of assistance has resulted in the household or individual. E '
very serious, I think, that anyone involved in this area this problem does not arise at all. If so you might account for errors that are serious committed, even with the best intentions, they collect data to avoid them in future, find ways to learn from this experience and pass on to others.

But all this is utopia. The volunteers involved in this field have at their disposal: no resources, the time remaining from their work commitments and little or no basic training. On the other hand abound: good will, good intentions, the "heart" and desire for "justice." I explain the importance of the effects of time and change individual / social conflict within the family with some examples.
Parents who call me years after I refer that:

- their children, after a trial as free agents, have left the group to which you were affiliated, and have re-established relations with them. 'S abandonment of the group, however, did not resolve the conflicts that clearly is not dependent from the requirement favored by parents but by factors inherent in family dynamics
- in other families the children were in the group which had affiliates, but, over time, conflicts are softened and contacts have been restored, in a sort of compromise that makes the most serene family dynamics for all

- in other cases still suffering the emotional loss of a spouse, that is addressed in two main ways: the resignation or anger, two extremes between which there are plenty of light and shade.

Quest 'last point leads me to reflect on a crucial problem is the topic of a future piece and synthetically formulated by two questions:



How much influence they had on me and on my way to assist past experiences and how angry I was at first and shared with others?


As the sorrow of others facilitates the action of assistance and how much, however, can hamper it?
  • "
The most important thing is to never stop asking questions

"
Albert Einstein