VICENZA
A murder a security guard, who has already served his sentence and is free session, had been licensed
Widow Sues prefecture "At the killer was given to carry firearms" The police
Arzignano and Valdagno el 'Health Authority had initially given a negative opinion, then the cards were changed. The family asks € 800 000. In a short sentence
Ivano Tolettini
In an individual with a habit of mind and that he had abused psychotropic substances could be released to carry firearms? Why is the police after initially Arzignano Valdagno and had given a negative opinion granting the license, and the same delegate ULSS had not considered suitable for psychotic decompensation with final outcome of "dependence on solvents in depressed," someone changed the cards on the table and George Garber, 46, of Arzignano, was put in a gun with which, by security guard , killed Mr Silvano Pellizzari?
Garbin (defended by Joseph Fucito) was sentenced to 8 years with fast-track trial because he was given the excuse of partial infirmity and thus achieved the reduction by half of the sentence. He also served a detention order in Montelupo Fiorentino and June is back open. The family
Pellizzari, for the grave loss suffered, has so far received a paltry compensation taking into account those happened and what he suffered. Therefore, his lawyer Cogolo Ferdinand has launched a civil suit for 800 000 € that came to the closing bars before the court in Venice. Have been cited in the Ministry of Interior, the prefecture of Vicenza Ovest Vicentino el'Ulss number 5 because each of them, according to the family of the guard ANCR Pellizzari, has made errors of assessment in the granting of firearms. Moreover, 27 December 1995 to the Carabinieri Arzignano about the conduct of Garbin had given a negative opinion of the issue of firearms because "the same could abuse the authorization request." A sign the service record was Commander Jurlo, mindful of previous Garbin dating back to '91 when he was acquitted by the formula of "not to proceed" from the magistrate of Arzignano accusation of theft had occurred because the amnesty.
The thumbs down was confirmed on 10 January '96, which withdrew from the company Valdagno Garbin subject "does not conform to the criterion of good conduct and also that, for balance, do not give full trust to not abuse the authorization request."
In both cases, the Carabinieri fears proved unfounded. However, the prefecture January 17, 1996 dismissing the negative opinions of police, testified that "Garbin - as stated in the act Citation - was also in possession of the requirements of Article 138 of the Codified Law of Public Security declared fit to undertake the security guard under oath. " Subsequently, the company command Valdagno radically altered the previous opinion of the then station commander Jurlo, stated, "Garbin is normal behavior in general." In fact, Garbin had a pre-existing mental illness, as submitted by Dr. Bonifacio, which was to prevent the issue of firearms.
When the prefecture was called into question, in law with the lawyer Schiesaro State also argued that the summons was nothing because he had changed his name, having become a Local Government. The question, of course, was piddling, so that the court rejected what in slang is called "lack of capacity to be sued," not having changed anything since there was only a nominal change. The prefecture, however, rejected any unlawful acts on his behavior because, his lawyer said, was to deceive the company Valdagno command. Its staff, he said, had been diligent. The Ministry of Interior el'Ulss 5 say they have no wrong. But Garbin killed. Someone had put the gun in his hand. The heirs of the victim must undergo twice to blame others? A word from the court.
